2026-05-22
get all material here: https://osf.io/zjrhu/
| Threat | Remedy |
|---|---|
| Switching of primary outcome to a variable that “works better” | Publicly write down the primary outcome before data collection |
| HARKing: “Hypothesizing after results are known” | Publicly write down hypotheses before data collection |
| Flexibility in data analysis (e.g., trying out different outlier exclusions to see which “work best”) | Specify exclusion rules and the full analysis plan before seeing the data |
| Threat label | Explanation | Remedy |
|---|---|---|
| Hindsight bias | Tendency to frame previous decisions or events as more predictable after the outcome is known (“I knew it all along”) | Write down your hypotheses and analysis plans before you see the data |
| Confirmation bias | Tendency to seek out, interpret, favor and recall information in a way that supports one’s prior expectations | Write down your decision rules and analysis plan before you see the data |
… prior to observing the outcomes of a study.
adapted from Nosek & Lindsay (2018), PRP-QUANT template, and RESQUE.
Confirmatory analysis
Exploratory analysis
Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p -Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
Discuss: What challenge does a secondary data analysis (from an existing dataset) pose?
✅ Essential:
☑️ Recommended:
van t‘Veer & Giner-Sorolla (2016)
✅ Essential:
van t‘Veer & Giner-Sorolla (2016)
✅ Essential:
van t‘Veer & Giner-Sorolla (2016), Schönbrodt & Wagenmakers (2017)
✅ Essential:
☑️ Recommended:
van t‘Veer & Giner-Sorolla (2016)
✅ Essential:
van t‘Veer & Giner-Sorolla (2016)
☑️ Recommended:
van t‘Veer & Giner-Sorolla (2016)
☑️ Recommended:
Lin & Green (2016)
Recommended:
TODO
Forschungsorientierte Praktikum I – Empirisches Praktikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München