How (not) to report a power analysis

Felix Schönbrodt

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

2024-04-19

Reproducibility & Justification

A well reported power analysis means:

  • Minimum: Anybody can reproduce the computations (without ambiguities and guessing), and get to the same result.
  • Optimal: Key choices are justified. Most importantly: the assumed effect size. But also: Why α=5% Why power = 80%?

What information do you need to compute a power analysis?

  • Type of power analysis:
    • A priori: compute N, given alpha, power, ES
    • Post-hoc: compute power, given alpha, N, ES
    • Criterion: compute alpha, given power, ES, N
    • Sensitivity: compute ES, given alpha, power, N
    • Design: Correlations? t-test? Two-group or paired? Linear model?
  • α = .05? .005?
  • Power = 80%?
  • One-sided or two-sided test?
  • Expected / Minimally interesting effect size -The metric of the effect size (d? r? \(f^2\)?)

Write-Up

Let’s check an issue from a journal …

How are power analyses reported in practice?

Example 1

# 10.1002/ejsp.2710: f2 = 0.07
# u: Number of predictors in the model (without intercept). Here presumably 3.
# n = v + u + 1; v = n- u - 1
pwr.f2.test(u = 3, v = 152-3-1, sig.level = 0.05, power = 0.8)
# -> f2 = 0.07366273

Example 2

Example 3

Example 4

# 10.1002/ejsp.2713
# guessing the ES and alpha
pwr.f2.test(u=3, f2=0.0435, sig.level = 0.05, power = 0.8)
# n -> 255

Example 5

# 10.1002/ejsp.2715
pwr.f2.test(u=1, f2=0.05, sig.level = 0.05, power = 0.8)
# n = 158

Example 6

End

Contact

CC-BY-SA 4.0